FleetProxy vs Bright Data
Choose FleetProxy when your team owns the scraping stack and needs egress. Choose Bright Data when you want the collection problem outsourced.
Loading page content.
Loading page content.
Head to head
SOAX is known for targeting granularity — country, region, city and carrier selection with flexible rotation controls — and for a strong mobile proxy offering. It is a serious network, and the buyers who choose it usually do so for exactly those targeting controls.
FleetProxy competes on the same axis but arrives from a different direction: the same granularity expressed as username parameters on every metered product, with a published rate card, non-expiring bandwidth, and no distinction between the entry tier and the top tier other than the price per gigabyte.
Last reviewed 15 Jan 2026.
At a glance
Very close on capability. Decide on commercial terms — bandwidth expiry, minimums and how rotation is configured — rather than on feature lists.
Both networks reach carrier-level targeting and both do mobile well. What differs is the commercial shape around it: our gigabytes do not expire, the rate card is public with automatic volume breaks, and rotation and stickiness are set per request in the username rather than in a dashboard configuration you have to keep in sync with your code. Whether that is an advantage depends on whether your rotation policy is a deployment concern or a runtime one.
How the claims on this page are written
SOAX
A network-focused provider emphasising granular geographic and carrier targeting with flexible rotation controls, and a well-regarded mobile pool. Self-serve plans alongside larger agreements.
Side by side
Eight dimensions that actually change the decision. Rows describe positioning rather than quoting figures we cannot keep current.
| Dimension | FleetProxy | SOAX |
|---|---|---|
| Targeting granularity | Country, city and ASN on every metered product | Country, region, city and carrier across the range |
| Where rotation is configured | Per request, in the proxy username | Largely in the dashboard, per port or plan |
| Mobile pool | Dedicated LTE ports and a bandwidth-billed rotating mobile pool | A core strength of the platform |
| Bandwidth expiry | Never expires | Plan-based; check the term before committing |
| Sticky sessions | Up to 30 minutes residential, 60 minutes mobile | Configurable session lifetimes |
| Pricing visibility | Public rate card with automatic volume breaks | Published plans, with larger volumes by arrangement |
| Configuration model | Code-first: everything is a username parameter | Dashboard-first, with API access |
| Free trial | 50MB residential, no card | Trial terms vary |
Mobile LTE proxies
A dedicated 4G/5G modem port behind carrier-grade NAT
The honest part
A comparison that concludes we win on every axis is an advertisement. These are the conditions we would use ourselves.
Rotation policy belongs in your code, not in a console
Encoding session and targeting parameters in the username means the policy lives in version control with the collector that depends on it.
Monthly volume is uneven
Non-expiring bandwidth removes the forecasting problem entirely. You buy gigabytes, you use them when you use them.
You want the same targeting semantics across every pool
Moving a workload from residential to mobile here is a change of credential, not a change of integration.
Non-engineers configure the proxies
A dashboard-led model is genuinely easier for an operations or research team that does not deploy code.
You need region-level targeting between country and city
If your workload segments by region rather than by city or ASN, their model maps onto it more directly than ours.
Mobile is the whole workload
Their mobile pool is a headline product with a strong reputation, and a mobile-only buyer should weigh that heavily.
Questions
Recommendation
Two networks with similar reach and different commercial shapes. If rotation is a runtime decision made by your code, we fit better. If it is an operational setting managed by a person, they probably do.
Choose FleetProxy when your team owns the scraping stack and needs egress. Choose Bright Data when you want the collection problem outsourced.
Oxylabs if you want managed scraping products with an account team behind them. FleetProxy if you want the network, priced per gigabyte, with no sales cycle.
Two providers built for the same buyer. Choose on bandwidth expiry, ASN targeting and how you want to pay — not on pool-size claims.
Every claim on this page is checkable in an afternoon. Claim 50MB of free residential bandwidth, run your own hostname list through it, and compare block rate and cost per successful request against whatever you use now.
No card required for the trial. Cancel or downgrade at any time.